Post Release Review¶
Purpose¶
This document is the Phase 10 landing zone for the first post-release review.
It also captures the final release-candidate review that immediately preceded the first public tag.
Release Summary¶
- release tag:
v0.1.0- release candidate reviewed:
v0.1.0- review date:
2026-03-07- supported topology validated:
- one BEAM node, one PostgreSQL instance, optional OTEL collector, source-first checkout
- release evidence:
docs/benchmarks/PHASE_10_RELEASE_VALIDATION.md
What Went Well¶
- the self-hosted BEAM runtime can now be validated end to end through one repeatable command
- the release demo seeds a console state that immediately shows precedent review, escalated workflows, and incident investigation
- the real release drill surfaced genuine runtime issues before release rather than after it
Issues Observed¶
- the release demo originally lacked a first-class seed path
- development reader and writer tokens were originally scoped too narrowly for the dedicated demo tenant
- workflow notification and action identifiers were not globally safe across repeated process lifecycles until Phase 10 fixed them
Early Signals¶
Capture:
- install success or failure themes
- upgrade or restore friction
- runtime or workflow issues reported first
- docs or demo misunderstandings
Current pre-release signals:
- the product feels much stronger when the first screen is a seeded live investigation rather than an empty shell
- the release path needs machine-readable evidence artifacts, not just prose checklists
- the self-hosted source-first posture is acceptable when the docs are explicit, but packaging expectations must stay honest
Immediate Fixes¶
- added
mix dg.demo.seed - added
mix dg.release.validate - widened local evaluation auth scopes to cover
release-demo - changed workflow notification and action identifiers to UUID-backed values
- rewrote install, showcase, and release docs around the actual validated command path
Follow-Up Backlog¶
Move durable follow-up items into:
docs/product/POST_RELEASE_BACKLOG.md
Decision¶
Conclude with:
- whether the release posture remains acceptable
- whether any hotfix is required
- whether the supported topology statement needs to change
Current decision:
- the release posture is acceptable for the documented source-first self-hosted topology
- no hotfix is required immediately after
v0.1.0; the validated release path is acceptable as shipped - the supported topology statement does not need to change; it needs to stay intentionally narrow